Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 2552 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of FX-6300
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - CA$191.81 vs CA$1271.30
- Up to 80% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i9-10920X - CA$0.43 vs CA$2.15 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 33% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than FX-6300 - 592 vs 445 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 24 vs 6 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
445
75%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.43/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$191.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$191.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 377 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
FPS
592
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.15/FPS
20%
Price, CA$
CA$1271.3
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,271.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 383 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-6300 | vs | Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Vishera | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
6 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |