The EPYC 7401P is a much slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the EPYC 7401P
- Consumes up to 6% less energy – 170 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Average FPS
173
96%
Min 1% FPS
116
96%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Average FPS
181
100%
Min 1% FPS
121
100%
Price, CA$
CA$898.35
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.96/FPS
100%
EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The EPYC 7401P vs Ryzen Threadripper 1950X in core CPU performance specifications
EPYC 7401P
Jun 29th, 2017
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
75%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Aug 10th, 2017
Cores
16-core
67%
L3 Cache
32 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
EPYC 7401P | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $999.00 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
| Naples | Codename | Whitehaven |
170 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 16 |
48 | Threads | 32 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.0 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
64 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 2666 MHz |
| No | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
