Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900F is 4347 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 18% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3820 - 199 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 10% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i7-3820 - CA$4.60 vs CA$5.09 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Core i7-3820
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - CA$860.72 vs CA$916.09
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
199
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.6/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$916.09
93%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$916.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
Buy for CA$860.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 212 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i7-3820 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |