Buy on Amazon
CA$860.72
In Stock
Prices and Stock
Prices and Stock
Prices and StockMSRP $999
Prices and Stock
MSRP $999
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1950X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is 2005 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3820.
Advantages of Core i7-3820
- Up to 5% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$860.72 vs CA$907.50
- Up to 2% better value when playing Baldur's Gate 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - CA$7.82 vs CA$7.96 per FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 130 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Performs up to 4% better in Baldur's Gate 3 than Core i7-3820 - 114 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3820 - 32 vs 8 threads
Baldur's Gate 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
FPS
110
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.82/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$860.72
100%
Value Winner
Intel Core i7-3820 Quad-Core Processor 3.6 GHz 10 MB Cache LGA 2011 - BX80619I73820
Buy for CA$860.72 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 275 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
114
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.96/FPS
98%
Price, CA$
CA$907.5
94%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor (YD195XA8AEWOF)
Buy for CA$907.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 276 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i7-3820
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2012
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3820 | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 13th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Whitehaven |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 16 |
| 8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Popular Core i7-3820 and Ryzen Threadripper 1950X Comparisons
Compare 2 Processors in Games
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CA$907.5
vs
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
CA$929
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CA$907.5
vs
Core i9-14900
CA$872.99
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CA$907.5
vs
Core i9-10900X
CA$881.82
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CA$907.5
vs
Core i9-10900K
CA$802.86
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CA$907.5
vs
Core i9-12900F
CA$806.43
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CA$907.5
vs
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CA$907.5
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CA$907.5
vs
Ryzen 9 7950X
CA$729
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CA$907.5
vs
Core i9-14900KF
CA$698.66
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CA$907.5
vs
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
CA$760
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
CA$907.5
vs
Ryzen 9 3950X
CA$1,006.6
Core i7-3820
CA$860.72
vs
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
CA$929
Core i7-3820
CA$860.72
vs
Core i9-14900
CA$872.99
Core i7-3820
CA$860.72
vs
Core i9-10900X
CA$881.82
Core i7-3820
CA$860.72
vs
Ryzen 9 3950X
CA$1,006.6
Core i7-3820
CA$860.72
vs
Core i7-3820
CA$860.72
Core i7-3820
CA$860.72
vs
Ryzen 9 7950X
CA$729
Core i7-3820
CA$860.72
vs
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
CA$760
Core i7-3820
CA$860.72
vs
Core i9-10900K
CA$802.86
Core i7-3820
CA$860.72
vs
Core i9-12900F
CA$806.43
Core i7-3820
CA$860.72
vs
Core i7-7800X
CA$742.91