In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-13900F is much faster than the Core i5-10400F. However, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $390 more expensive!
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 61% faster in Battlefield 6 – 127 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 61% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 74% cheaper – $139.55 vs $529.95
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 58% better value in Battlefield 6 – $1.76 vs $4.17/FPS
- Up to 58% better value in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
127 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
95 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.95
26%
Value, $/FPS
$4.17/FPS
42%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
79 FPS
62%
Min 1% FPS
59 FPS
62%
Price, $
$139.55
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.76/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
