In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i9-13900F is slightly slower than the Core i5-10400F and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $390 more expensive!
Core i9-13900F
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 2 years and 8 months newer
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 174 vs 169 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 74% cheaper – $140.25 vs $529.95
- Up to 74% cheaper
- Up to 74% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.80 vs $3.13/FPS
- Up to 74% better value in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
169 FPS
97%
Min 1% FPS
127 FPS
98%
Price, $
$529.95
26%
Value, $/FPS
$3.13/FPS
26%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
100%
Price, $
$140.25
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.8/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-13900F vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
12 MB
33%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
77%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
48%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| $524.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1700 | Socket | LGA1200 |
| 65 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
