Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 7 3700X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 7 3700X.
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen 7 3700X - 462 vs 426 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$193.71 vs CA$570.89
- Up to 64% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i9-11900K - CA$0.45 vs CA$1.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
462
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.24/FPS
36%
Price, CA$
CA$570.89
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$570.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
426
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$193.71
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$193.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900K | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |