Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 5600GT on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 1028 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 5600GT.
Advantages of Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 7% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 5600GT - 74 vs 69 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT - 16 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - CA$179.98 vs CA$571.24
- Up to 66% better value when playing Starfield than Core i9-11900K - CA$2.61 vs CA$7.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
74
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$7.72/FPS
34%
Price, CA$
CA$571.24
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$571.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7010 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
69
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.61/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$179.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7010 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-11900K | vs | Ryzen 5 5600GT |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
16 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |