Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K is 157 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3960X.
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 3% better in The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 133 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 28% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$809.00 vs CA$1125.00
- Up to 30% better value when playing The Callisto Protocol than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$6.08 vs CA$8.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 55% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 125 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900K - 48 vs 20 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
133
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$6.08/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$809
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$809 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 508 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
129
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$8.72/FPS
70%
Price, CA$
CA$1125
71%
Buy for CA$1,125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 508 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900K | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 3960X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
20 | Threads | 48 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |