Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1538 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700K.
Advantages of Core i7-9700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 2% better in F1 22 than Core i7-9700K - 287 vs 280 FPS
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i7-9700K - CA$270.73 vs CA$383.97
- Up to 31% better value when playing F1 22 than Core i7-9700K - CA$0.94 vs CA$1.37 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700K - 16 vs 8 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for CA$383.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
287
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.94/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.73
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-9700K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |