In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i7-9700K is slightly slower than the Core i5-13400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i7-9700K
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-13400F
- Up to 11% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 118 vs 106 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Oct 19, 2018
- Is 4 years and 2 months newer
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 32% less energy
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i7-9700K vs Core i5-13400F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
106 FPS
90%
Min 1% FPS
79 FPS
90%
Price, $
$199.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.88/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-9700K vs Core i5-13400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-9700K vs Core i5-13400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-9700K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
80%
L3 Cache
12 MB
60%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
56%
Core i5-13400F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
69%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
94%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-9700K Oct 19th, 2018 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-13400F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 19th, 2018 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| $385.00 | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1151 | Socket | LGA1700 |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2666 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
