Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Core i7-940XM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 4867 days newer than Core i7-940XM.
Advantages of Core i7-940XM
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 46% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-940XM - 166 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-940XM - 32 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
166
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.2/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$696.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$696.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jun 20th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-940XM | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 Extreme | Collection | Core i9 |
Clarksfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |