The Core i7-870 is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i7-870
The Core i7-10700F is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i7-10700F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 32% less energy – 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 8 threads
Core i7-870 vs Core i7-10700F for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-870
Sep 8th, 2009
Average FPS
167
87%
Min 1% FPS
113
90%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
191
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, CA$
CA$358.88
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.87/FPS
100%
Core i7-870 vs Core i7-10700F in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-870 vs Core i7-10700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-870 vs Core i7-10700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-870
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.93 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
75%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
99%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-870 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 8th, 2009 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Lynnfield | Codename | Comet Lake |
95 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | No |