Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the more expensive Core i7-10700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 189 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-10700F.
Advantages of Core i7-10700F
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than Core i7-10700F - 158 vs 153 FPS
- Up to 13% cheaper than Core i7-10700F - CA$379.95 vs CA$435.52
- Up to 16% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i7-10700F - CA$2.40 vs CA$2.85 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-10700F - 24 vs 16 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for CA$435.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$379.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$379.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 68 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-10700F | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
16 | Threads | 24 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 105 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |