Key Differences
In short — Core i7-12700F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-12700F is 1608 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Core i7-12700F
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 208 vs 181 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-12700F - 32 vs 20 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
181
87%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.1/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$923.17
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$923.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 355 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-12700F | vs | Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 16 |
20 | Threads | 32 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |