In Battlefield 6, the Core i5-L16G7 is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-10900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i5-L16G7
- Is 1 month and 13 days newer – Jun 13, 2020 vs Apr 30, 2020
- Is 1 month and 13 days newer
- Consumes up to 94% less energy – 7 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 94% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10900KF
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6 – 90 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 48% faster in Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-10900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-10900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-L16G7 vs Core i9-10900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-L16G7
Jun 13th, 2020
Cores
5-core
50%
L3 Cache
4 MB
20%
Base Frequency
1.4 GHz
38%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
57%
Max. LPDDR4X RAM Speed
4267 MHz
100%
Core i9-10900KF
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
69%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i5-L16G7 Jun 13th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10900KF Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 13th, 2020 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
$281.00 | MSRP | $509.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Socket | LGA1200 | |
7 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 4267 MHz (LPDDR4X) | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
UHD Graphics 64EU | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
