Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 2192 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Core i5-7400T
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$92.81 vs CA$743.19
- Up to 87% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X3D - CA$0.40 vs CA$3.08 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D - 35 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 5% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i5-7400T - 241 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 32 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
230
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$92.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$92.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6939 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
241
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.08/FPS
13%
Price, CA$
CA$743.19
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$743.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7213 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7400T | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |