Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-7400T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-7400T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 915 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-7400T.
Advantages of Core i5-7400T
- Up to 52% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$92.81 vs CA$193.71
- Up to 50% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 7 3700X - CA$0.44 vs CA$0.88 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 4% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-7400T - 220 vs 211 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7400T - 16 vs 4 threads
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
211
96%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.44/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$92.81
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$92.81 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
220
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.88/FPS
50%
Price, CA$
CA$193.71
47%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$193.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 246 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-7400T | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |