Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-3470 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-3470 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3443 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-3470.
Advantages of Core i5-3470
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - CA$187.76 vs CA$269.04
- Up to 10% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-12600KF - CA$1.21 vs CA$1.34 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i5-3470 - 201 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3470 - 16 vs 4 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
155
77%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$187.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$187.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
201
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.34/FPS
90%
Price, CA$
CA$269.04
69%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$269.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-3470 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |