The Core i5-3320M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-10700K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Core i5-3320M vs Core i7-10700K for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
168
88%
Min 1% FPS
113
89%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, CA$
CA$550
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.86/FPS
100%
Core i5-3320M vs Core i7-10700K in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i7-10700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3320M vs Core i7-10700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
68%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
65%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700K
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-3320M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.8 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.1 GHz |
3 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
Other Features | ||
unknown | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |