The Core i5-3320M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 9 7900. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i5-3320M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Ryzen 9 7900
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 4 threads
Core i5-3320M vs Ryzen 9 7900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Average FPS
168
77%
Min 1% FPS
113
79%
Price, CA$
Out of Stock
Value, CA$/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, CA$
CA$530.17
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.43/FPS
100%
Core i5-3320M vs Ryzen 9 7900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-3320M vs Ryzen 9 7900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-3320M vs Ryzen 9 7900 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-3320M
Jun 1st, 2012
Cores
2-core
17%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
2.6 GHz
70%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
61%
Max. unknown RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 9 7900
Jan 14th, 2023
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
64 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-3320M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 9 7900 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $429.00 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 5.4 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 64 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| unknown | RAM | DDR5 @ 5200 MHz |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
