Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 3600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 618 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 3600.
Advantages of Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 3600 - 253 vs 245 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Up to 46% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$167.62 vs CA$309.46
- Up to 44% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-11600K - CA$0.68 vs CA$1.22 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
253
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.22/FPS
56%
Price, CA$
CA$309.46
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$309.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 141 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
245
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.68/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.62
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600K | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |