Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 5500 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 5500 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 384 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 5 5500.
Advantages of Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 8% better in Starfield than Ryzen 5 5500 - 71 vs 66 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 5500 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5500
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i5-11600K - CA$119.00 vs CA$309.36
- Up to 59% better value when playing Starfield than Core i5-11600K - CA$1.80 vs CA$4.36 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-11600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
71
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.36/FPS
41%
Price, CA$
CA$309.36
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$309.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6989 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
66
93%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.8/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$119
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$119 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6714 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-11600K | vs | Ryzen 5 5500 |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 750 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |