Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 4238 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 140% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-3110M - 545 vs 227 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 16 vs 4 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
545
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$388.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$388.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 28 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3110M | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |