Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 3079 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 35 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 5900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 23% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3110M - 452 vs 368 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 24 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
452
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.83/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$377
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$377 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-3110M | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |