Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 21 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Celeron G6900
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - CA$103.99 vs CA$109.00
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 7% better in Overwatch 2 than Celeron G6900 - 379 vs 355 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for CA$103.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
379
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$109
95%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$109 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G6900 | vs | Core i3-12100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 25th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 58 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |