Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2483 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600K - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 11% better in God of War than Celeron B815 - 178 vs 160 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 6 vs 2 threads
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
178
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$185
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$185 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |