Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms Celeron B815 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 4021 days newer than Celeron B815.
Advantages of Celeron B815
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 136% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Celeron B815 - 488 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron B815 - 16 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
488
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$270.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$270.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron B815 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
1.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
16.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |