Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX outperforms FX-8300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX is 3423 days newer than FX-8300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX
- Performs up to 101% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than FX-8300 - 135 vs 67 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8300 - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8300
- Consumes up to 66% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX - 95 vs 280 Watts
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
FPS
135
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
FPS Winner
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
FPS
67
49%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.25/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$83.46
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$83.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 46 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 8th, 2022
Single-Core
2065
100%
Multi-Core
14738
100%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX | vs | AMD FX-8300 |
---|---|---|
Mar 8th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | FX |
Chagall | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 8 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |