Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2136 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 5% better in World of Tanks than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 542 vs 518 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 85 vs 280 Watts
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
542
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.67/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1987.31
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,987.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 53 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 85 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |