Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1904 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 85 vs 280 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 11% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 194 vs 174 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 - 64 vs 16 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
194
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$10.31/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$2000
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$2,000 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1041 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 25th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket TRX4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 32 |
16 | Threads | 64 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |