Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 1546 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 6% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-6700T - 181 vs 170 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 48 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$162.98 vs CA$1123.99
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - 35 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
181
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1123.99
14%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,123.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 299 minutes ago
Buy for CA$162.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 300 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Single-Core
1183
70.96580683863228%
Multi-Core
3566
26.777802808440338%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i7 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Skylake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
48 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |