Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 3960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3960X is 771 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
- Performs up to 2% better in Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales than Celeron G6900 - 129 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 48 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 90% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3960X - CA$113.5 vs CA$1125.0
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Marvel's Spider-Man: Miles Morales
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
129
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
Price, CA$
CA$1125
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$1,125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73 minutes ago
Buy for CA$113.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
96.16076784643072%
Multi-Core
2696
20.24479987985282%
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3960X | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Celeron |
Castle Peak | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
48 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |