Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 895 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600KF - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 8% better in DOOM Eternal than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 522 vs 483 FPS
- Up to 75% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$290.16 vs CA$1163.52
- Up to 77% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - CA$0.56 vs CA$2.41 per FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
483
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.41/FPS
23%
Price, CA$
CA$1163.52
24%
Buy for CA$1,163.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4158 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
522
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.56/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$290.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$290.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Colfax | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |