Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 1973 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 28% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 158 vs 123 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
158
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$3.48/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$549.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$549.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X | vs | Intel Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Aug 10th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |