Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 15% better in God of War than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 196 vs 170 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 120 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
196
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$5.76/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$1129.29
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$1,129.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
38.55421686746988%
Multi-Core
3898
22.301046970650496%
AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Raphael | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 8 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 140 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
44.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |