Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900X is 1216 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900X - 140 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900X
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 228 vs 221 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 20 vs 8 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$452.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77147 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Single-Core
1088
69.03553299492386%
Multi-Core
3898
41.59641447017394%
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |