Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 6900HS outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 6900HS is 927 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS
- Performs up to 23% better in Starfield than Ryzen 3 3200G - 65 vs 53 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
53
81%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.51/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$133.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$133.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5089 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 6900HS | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Rembrandt | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket FP7 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
6 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon 680M | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |