Buy on Amazon
CA$550.93
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $499
Availability
MSRP in USD: $499
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900XT outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900XT is 3191 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT
- Performs up to 20% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-4100 - 137 vs 114 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 24 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$31.73 vs CA$550.93
- Up to 93% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 9 3900XT - CA$0.28 vs CA$4.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 10% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT - 95 vs 105 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.02/FPS
6.965174129353235%
Price, CA$
CA$550.93
5%
FPS Winner
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT 12-core, 24-thread unlocked desktop processor without cooler
Buy for CA$550.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 145 minutes ago
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
114
83.21167883211679%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$31.73
100%
Value Winner
AMD FX-Series FX-4100 CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.6 GHz 8M 95W Socket AM3+
Buy for CA$31.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Ryzen 9 3900XT
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2020
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 9 3900XT | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Ryzen 9 | Collection | FX |
| Matisse | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 4 |
24 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 105 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
