Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X is 2299 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
- Performs up to 8% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i3-4160 - 230 vs 212 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 88% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5800X - CA$36.99 vs CA$299.98
- Up to 87% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 7 5800X - CA$0.17 vs CA$1.3 per FPS
- Consumes up to 49% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X - 54 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
230
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.3/FPS
13%
Price, CA$
CA$299.98
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$299.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 32 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
212
92%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 33 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Core i3 |
Vermeer | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
105 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |