Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4160 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4160 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 3458 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4160.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Core i3-4160 - 251 vs 237 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4160 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4160
- Up to 80% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600GT - CA$36.99 vs CA$183.98
- Up to 78% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 5600GT - CA$0.16 vs CA$0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT - 54 vs 65 Watts
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
251
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.73/FPS
22%
Price, CA$
CA$183.98
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$183.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
237
94%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.16/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$36.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$36.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 172 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT | vs | Intel Core i3-4160 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Not Available | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Radeon Vega 7 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |