Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 1700 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 1700 is 1822 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 1700
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2680 - 100 vs 92 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 - 65 vs 130 Watts
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
FPS
100
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$4.04/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$403.64
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$403.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6430 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 2nd, 2017
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 1700 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 |
---|---|---|
Mar 2nd, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 6th, 2012 |
Ryzen 7 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge-EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |