Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3956 days newer than Xeon E5-2680.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 22% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2680 - 206 vs 169 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for CA$255.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65337 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Single-Core
542
23.699169217315262%
Multi-Core
3336
32.18834426862215%
Intel Xeon E5-2680 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
No | Overclockable | No |