Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms Ryzen 5 4600HS on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 363 days older than Ryzen 5 4600HS.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9400F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 12 vs 6 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 1% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Ryzen 5 4600HS - 167 vs 165 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
167
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.92/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$153.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$153.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17233 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 4600HS | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Renoir | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket FP6 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 6 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |