Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 136 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 29% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Athlon 3000G - 391 vs 303 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 3600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for CA$169.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78012 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Single-Core
957
59.924859110832806%
Multi-Core
1975
28.6897152818129%
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Athlon |
Matisse | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |