Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-7640X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-7640X is 297 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2600X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2600X
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 95 vs 112 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2600X - 247 vs 240 FPS
- Up to 19% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2600X - CA$298.99 vs CA$368.49
- Up to 21% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Ryzen 5 2600X - CA$1.21 vs CA$1.54 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
FPS
240
97.16599190283401%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.54/FPS
78.57142857142857%
Price, CA$
CA$368.49
81%
Buy for CA$368.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3729 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
FPS
247
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$298.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$298.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3728 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 19th, 2018
Single-Core
1237
70.24417944349801%
Multi-Core
5263
99.77251184834122%
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X | vs | Intel Core i5-7640X |
---|---|---|
Apr 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Pinnacle Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 112 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |