Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 2500U outperforms FX-8150 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 2500U is 2206 days newer than FX-8150.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2500U
- Performs up to 4% better in F1 22 than FX-8150 - 262 vs 251 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
FPS
251
95%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$87.12
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$87.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 31 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Oct 26th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2500U | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
---|---|---|
Oct 26th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | FX |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Radeon Vega 8 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |