Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10920X outperforms Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10920X is 614 days newer than Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10920X
- Performs up to 15% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Ryzen 5 2400G - 220 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 24 vs 8 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for CA$1,213.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74767 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Single-Core
1057
63.104477611940304%
Multi-Core
3294
29.024583663758925%
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Cascade Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |