Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i7-6900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i7-6900K is 622 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Core i7-6900K - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6900K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 2400G - 128 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen 5 2400G - CA$258.88 vs CA$291.92
- Up to 14% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Ryzen 5 2400G - CA$2.02 vs CA$2.34 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for CA$291.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17392 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
128
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$2.02/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$258.88
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$258.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G | vs | Intel Core i7-6900K |
---|---|---|
Feb 12th, 2018 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raven Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Radeon RX Vega 11 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |