Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9350KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 1600 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-9350KF is 637 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 1600.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-9350KF - CA$89.0 vs CA$184.99
- Up to 43% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Core i3-9350KF - CA$0.28 vs CA$0.49 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 65 vs 91 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9350KF - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9350KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 5 1600 - 377 vs 318 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
318
84%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$89
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
377
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.49/FPS
57%
Price, CA$
CA$184.99
48%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$184.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 | vs | Intel Core i3-9350KF |
---|---|---|
Apr 11th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Ryzen 5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |